This is at least the second time that I have read
Shakespeare’s Measure
for Measure. For this go around, I will try to get at the big theme.
For those not familiar with the plot, the action takes place
in Vienna. The Duke, who apparently has let the city fall into debauchery and
disorder, announces plans to leave town for a time and put his lieutenant, the
seemingly virtuous Angelo, in charge. Initially the Duke expects Angelo to get
things straightened out. Angelo takes over and quickly tunes oppressive,
arresting and sentencing to death anyone accused of adultery, prostitution,
etc. One of the victim’s is Claudio, who is arrested and sentenced to die for
adultery.
When Claudio’s sister, the extremely virtuous, but charismatic
and attractive Isabella, begs Angelo for her brother’s life, Angelo, proves
himself the ultimate hypocrite by agreeing to spare Claudio on the condition
that Isabella sleep with him. Isabella, who will clearly never agree to the
proposition, sadly resigns herself to the fact that her brother will die.
Meanwhile, the Duke, who is secretly still in the city
disguised as a friar, hears of Claudio and Isabella’s troubles, and executes an
elaborate plan to fool Angelo into sleeping with another women disguised as
Isabella, spare Claudio’s life, re –establish his governance of the city, as
well as act as a matchmaker for most of the major characters. His plan works out,
he arranges for several (very ill conceived) marriages, including his own to
Isabella.
To me, The Vienna of Measure
for Measure is a little microcosm of the Universe as a whole. I believe
this to be true of several of the Bard’s works. Though common themes and
philosophy run through all of these plays, sometimes Shakespeare’s “Theory of
Everything” varies a little bit among these works. For instance, I see King
Lear as taking place in a Universe of pure chaos, where malevolence and
insanity are natural laws and where there is little or no justice for the good.
Measure
for Measure presents a world that is at times less nasty, but no less
chaotic.
At first glance the play can be interpreted as championing a
Christian worldview. After all, the fanatically pious Isabella in the end, retains
her saintliness, sees her brother saved and her reputation elevated. If the
Duke is a symbol of a Deity, Isabella has been justly rewarded for her
Christian virtues.
There seems to be more to it, however, The Duke does seem to represent, God, or at least
a symbol of how the Universe is works. This conclusion seems inevitable since
he is in able control of everything behind the scenes, from the beginning of
the play, to the end. When the Duke chooses to, He controls Vienna with almost
no trouble or impediments. At the conclusion, he doles out justice and
forgiveness.
But he is a mischievous, imperfect, a little corrupt and
sometimes not very enthusiastic about life. Lest one think that the control
mentioned above is constant, it is clear from even his own statements, that
this period of manipulations has followed a long stretch of time when he was
very much asleep at the wheel. He exerts
control in a lazy fashion, when and how he chooses to.
Though the Duke is not an oppressor, Lucio, one of many
scandalous citizens of Vienna, points out his weaknesses as a ruler, “A very
superficial, ignorant, unweighing fellow”, and later accuses him of lechery. He
is a ruler that at times, metes out the mildest punishments for severe crimes,
yet during other periods, allows oppressive, sadistic and hypocritical tyrants
to hold sway and cause misery for others.
Furthermore, while attempting to convince Claudio that he
should accept death, the Duke provides a memorable, nihilistic speech on the
inevitable unhappiness and meaninglessness of life.
Yet, this ruler does bring rewards to the ultimate Christian,
Isabella. However he also rewards, or at least pardons with no consequences
others, including the monstrous Angelo and the slothful, drunken and
indifferent Barnardine. One can argue that the Christian God forgives, but
these characters do not ask for forgiveness. The Dukes decisions in the end in
no way seem to mete out Justice and there is no sense that any of the nefarious
persons have learned anything. While pious virtue is not punished, Shakespeare
seems ultimately ambivalent towards Isabella’s nearly psychotic religiosity.
Measure
for Measure presents us with a world and its controller that, if not as
cruel as King Lear, is often random and full of meaningless sufferings. There
is more corruption here then there is justice. Sometimes however, if one is
lucky, things can turn out OK, at least for a while.
I really enjoyed reading this, so much so that I hope to actually go see the play sometime soon!
ReplyDeleteI wish I had read more Shakespeare. I enjoyed it at school, but not so good at going it alone. A major disadvantage when so much literature references him.
ReplyDeleteYou made Measure for Measure sound fascinating. Yes, I am tempted.
I really had a lot of trouble understanding Shakespeare for a long time. It took me lots of practice to really comprehend him. I remember reading through plays and missing so much and being very frustrated. After a while one gets the knack of him, but it takes work. I have heard that using a companion text, one that helps to explain the strange words and references helps. In retrospect I am sorry that I did not use one early on
ReplyDelete. I am glad that I stuck with it, he is well worth it!